TheInCredible Messenger

ICM tools / Firearm violence

Cost of Violence Calculator

See the burden. Check the assumptions. Build a stronger case for coordinated prevention.

01 / Define the community

County searches use CDC geography names. ZIP and city searches use Esri to suggest county context. No address or personal information is needed.

02 / Understand the violence

Count people killed or injured, not incidents, arrests, hospital revisits, or every aggravated assault involving a firearm.

Firearm homicides · No period selectedUnavailable

No complete, comparable national county feed is available here. Enter a documented local count of hospital-treated assault injuries. Do not estimate it from a fatal-to-nonfatal ratio. A blank is unknown; enter 0 only if the source explicitly reports zero.

CDC homicide includes interpersonal deaths and terrorism coded as homicide; it does not isolate street violence or exclude intimate-partner homicide. Police crime counts, death certificates and hospital records measure different things. For strict local incident definitions, use manual entry.

03 / Calculate the burden

Costs may continue for years after the injury. These are burdens associated with the selected year’s injuries, not that year’s government budget. Federal, state and local costs are combined.

Choose a community, provide at least one known count and its source, then confirm the definitions and research proxy to see an estimate.

Government / taxpayer

—

Response, justice, publicly financed care and benefits.

Economic burden

—

Medical, mental health, employer and work losses. Includes public and private payers.

Do not add these views together. Public medical costs appear in both. The economic view here excludes police, courts, corrections, transport and government transfers.

Societal / quality-of-life valuation

Economic injury research values lost well-being separately from bills and lost work. This is not government spending and not a price assigned to a person’s life.

Not calculated

This separate lens is not used in the prevention-budget comparison.

How was this calculated? Quality of life

For each row: (fatal count × fatal unit cost + nonfatal count × nonfatal unit cost) × 1.259277. Unit costs below are in 2019 dollars. Blank counts contribute no estimate; they are not zero.

Quality of life: national research inputs and your results
CategoryPer fatalityPer nonfatal injuryYour estimate (2025 dollars)
Lost quality of life$13,492,636$716,631Not calculated

Counts used: Unavailable fatal; Unavailable nonfatal. Published numerical inputs · Research methods, assumptions and cost definitions

Read ICM’s model boundaries and exclusions

04 / See where the burden falls

How was this calculated? Government / taxpayer

For each row: (fatal count × fatal unit cost + nonfatal count × nonfatal unit cost) × 1.259277. Unit costs below are in 2019 dollars. Blank counts contribute no estimate; they are not zero.

Government / taxpayer: national research inputs and your results
CategoryPer fatalityPer nonfatal injuryYour estimate (2025 dollars)
Police response and investigation$154,582$10,104Not calculated
Courts, corrections and victim assistance$541,943$10,146Not calculated
Emergency transport$679$186Not calculated
Publicly financed injury medical care$5,217$16,921Not calculated
Publicly financed mental health care$7,564$147Not calculated
Additional Medicaid and SSI payments$0$3,795Not calculated

Counts used: Unavailable fatal; Unavailable nonfatal. Published numerical inputs · Research methods, assumptions and cost definitions

Read ICM’s model boundaries and exclusions
How was this calculated? Economic burden

For each row: (fatal count × fatal unit cost + nonfatal count × nonfatal unit cost) × 1.259277. Unit costs below are in 2019 dollars. Blank counts contribute no estimate; they are not zero.

Economic burden: national research inputs and your results
CategoryPer fatalityPer nonfatal injuryYour estimate (2025 dollars)
Medical care, all payers$9,630$31,237Not calculated
Mental health care, all payers$13,964$271Not calculated
Employer losses$11,003$1,417Not calculated
Work and household production losses$1,423,783$37,357Not calculated

Counts used: Unavailable fatal; Unavailable nonfatal. Published numerical inputs · Research methods, assumptions and cost definitions

Read ICM’s model boundaries and exclusions

05 / Compare response and prevention

Budget years through 2025 have a complete annual inflation index. For a newer budget, first obtain a documented comparable-dollar figure; do not relabel it as an older budget.

Describe the allocation (optional)

Use non-overlapping amounts. An HVIP can also be CVI; count that funding once. Categories describe your reported portfolio, not proof of effectiveness.

Allocated: $0

The percentage requires both fatal and nonfatal counts, a positive estimated burden, a budget source and the scope confirmation. Counting only part of the estimated cost would give a misleading percentage.

This is a scale comparison, not a return on investment. Response costs cannot all be redirected. Fewer shootings do not automatically release an equivalent amount of cash from agency budgets.

06 / Put the evidence to work

A collection of agencies and programs is not a public safety strategy.

ICM application: bring the health department, budget office, response agencies, service providers and affected residents together. Confirm the geography and counts first. Then map who pays, who can change the response, and what prevention, intervention and recovery capacity is missing.

For example, a council funding discussion needs more than a large cost estimate. Assign someone to reconcile hospital and police records, ask finance staff which costs are fixed, and give each proposed investment an owner, a service-capacity target and an outcome review date. A CVI program is one part of that coordinated system.

The download is a printable HTML document. Entries stay in this tab; they are not submitted as an inquiry. Location lookups are sent to the geography service. The briefing records unavailable measures and the model’s limits.

Methodology and evidence

ICM firearm-cost model 1.0 / 2026-09-30. This ICM tool applies national research inputs to documented local counts. It is not an audit, a local cost study, or an evaluation of a proposed program.

Sources, calculation and exclusions

Everytown/PIRE’s published national cost inputs accompany its 2022 methodological note, based on 2019 injuries and deaths. We use the United States assault/homicide row, separately for fatal and nonfatal injuries. The broader source category includes legal intervention and terrorism. ICM does not add those incidents to your entered assault counts; the unit costs remain a proxy with that limitation.

Every row follows count × national average cost. Government totals use the public share; economic totals here use medical, mental health, employer and work losses. Quality of life is separate. Work losses include victim and perpetrator production losses. Criminal justice combines courts, prosecution/defense, corrections and victim assistance; this source does not support a reliable local split between those agencies.

Research assumptions cover emergency and later care, expected justice involvement, and future losses. They do not reflect local salaries, hospital prices, clearance rates, sentencing, injury severity or age mix. Federal and state costs are not all borne by the city. No uncertainty interval is invented; displayed dollars reflect arithmetic, not that level of real-world precision.

All base unit costs are 2019 dollars. Display conversion multiplies by the BLS annual all-items CPI-U for the chosen year divided by 255.657. A budget is independently converted from its stated dollar year. This broad inflation adjustment does not update medical practice, wages, sentencing or the underlying research. It is not a forecast.

Excluded from ICM’s monetary estimates: local property values, business formation, tax-revenue effects, displacement, school disruption, trust, untreated nonfatal injuries and a complete accounting of family or service-provider burdens. Government and economic views overlap and must not be summed. Missing counts stay unknown.

CDC WISQARS distinguishes fatalities, hospitalizations and emergency-department visits; its nonfatal estimates are national, not ZIP counts. NICJR’s 2023 national report provides a different government-cost model. Its average costs account for cases that do not proceed through the full justice process. We do not mix its values with PIRE or use its higher full-case costs as average costs. BJS corrections data can inform a local study; prison population or sentence statistics alone are not a cost per shooting.

Community impacts beyond this calculator

Urban Institute’s six-city neighborhood research (2017) connects concentrated violence with changes in business activity, employment, housing and credit. Those findings do not supply a transferable price for an individual ZIP code.

Everytown’s survivor research describes trauma and disruption in daily life. These accounts add context; they do not establish a local dollar amount. Ask families, schools and providers about interrupted care, attendance, displacement, trust and unmet support needs, and report those findings separately.

Explore the cost of implementing prevention

A program budget needs a service population, staffing and supervision plan, partner commitments, data capacity and sustained funding. A category label is not an implementation plan.

Everytown and HAVI’s HVIP costing guide gives an illustrative model of about $1.08 million annually for 100 participants, a community organization working with one midsize-city hospital, and 15% indirect costs. This is the guide’s 2024 planning example, not an inflation-adjusted local quote or a promised effect. Use its staffing assumptions to build a local budget. We do not assign unsupported national price ranges to other intervention types.